<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Primary Impact</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.primaryimpact.com/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.primaryimpact.com/blog</link>
	<description>@ The Intersection of Marketing and Technology</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 09:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on It&#8217;s D-Day: The State of Digital Display by Shea Park</title>
		<link>http://www.primaryimpact.com/blog/?p=70&#038;cpage=1#comment-1708</link>
		<dc:creator>Shea Park</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.primaryimpact.com/blog/?p=70#comment-1708</guid>
		<description>Kathryn Koegel, what an incredibly insightful and gracious report!  Thank you for the immense data and thought leadership in your work presented here. 
Shea Park

@ Shea_Park  
Ad-Spark.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathryn Koegel, what an incredibly insightful and gracious report!  Thank you for the immense data and thought leadership in your work presented here.<br />
Shea Park</p>
<p>@ Shea_Park<br />
Ad-Spark.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on So 2002? No, So 1932 by Kevin Killion</title>
		<link>http://www.primaryimpact.com/blog/?p=3&#038;cpage=1#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Killion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.primaryimpact.com/blog/?p=3#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Kathryn,

That's a most compelling comparison about FDR and radio with Obama and the Internet.  You might also throw in the Nixon-Kennedy debates, where JFK luxuriated in TV while the stubble-faced, no-makeup Nixon erroneously thought the election was going to be about issues and ideas.

One needn't limit the comparisons to the U.S.:  Hitler and Mussolini also made extremely effective use of radio in the 1930s to rally their countries as well.

-- Kevin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathryn,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a most compelling comparison about FDR and radio with Obama and the Internet.  You might also throw in the Nixon-Kennedy debates, where JFK luxuriated in TV while the stubble-faced, no-makeup Nixon erroneously thought the election was going to be about issues and ideas.</p>
<p>One needn&#8217;t limit the comparisons to the U.S.:  Hitler and Mussolini also made extremely effective use of radio in the 1930s to rally their countries as well.</p>
<p>&#8211; Kevin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on So 2002? No, So 1932 by Allan Hoving</title>
		<link>http://www.primaryimpact.com/blog/?p=3&#038;cpage=1#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan Hoving</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.primaryimpact.com/blog/?p=3#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Hi, Kathryn, I've got an idea: user-centric online revenue model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Kathryn, I&#8217;ve got an idea: user-centric online revenue model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
